search armlet patch

  • Previous message: search armlet patch
  • Next message: search armlet patch
  • Alexander R. Pruss ap85 at georgetown.edu
    Mon Jun 9 16:30:29 EDT 2003

     

    On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote:
    > BTW, the useArmlet variable seems to be a bit of fluff; the armChunkH
    > (we can discuss the choice of name, though) already indicates if we
    > are using the armlet or not, i.e. is it NULL or not. Use it and you
    > can drop the MemPtrRecoverHandle, too.
    
    I prefer useArmlet for two reasons.  First, it might well speed up the
    search by an infinitesimal amount, since it's faster to check an 8-bit
    value than a 32-bit value (especially, I suspect, under PACE).  Second,
    it's clearer to have useArmlet, because whether one uses the armlet
    depends not just on whether there is an armc resource, but also on whether
    the text is 8-bits wide.
    
    > If you think it is difficult to run configure, then write a shell
    > script to do it for you ;-)
    
    That's what I do. :-)
    
    Alex
    
    --
    Dr. Alexander R. Pruss  || e-mail: ap85 at georgetown.edu
    Philosophy Department   || online papers and home page:
    Georgetown University   ||  www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ap85
    Washington, DC 20057    ||
    U.S.A.                  ||
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
       "Philosophiam discimus non ut tantum sciamus, sed ut boni efficiamur."
           - Paul of Worczyn (1424)
    
    
    

     

     

    More information about the plucker-dev mailing list